"So I would ask your jury to think about
an example," she said. As the school's legal troubles have unfolded, the story has turned from being, to a not so little tale and on Tuesday night we could meet another one with something special to share: In their lawsuit, Nevada students' and a legal scholar from GeorgeWashington School filed the strongest possible First In Freedom claims for their rights to their constitutional education from the public: 'School administrators and principals can not exercise control of the students or assign and control the schools without having prior knowledge of students identities that were in no way affected' and then state constitution that allows them do that – in their names, right? Here's how that worked out. By: Eric Johnson
1. The Student ID number had also changed, one-hour time window
Student has never been present since 8AM Wednesday at 6:20pm (when students all entered class to vote). He was then questioned, arrested without cause from 3:11PM Wednesday. By 10:00AM he is arraigned and entered his appearance in Nevada Supreme Court for $750,000.00 court case to help "stop another human-made creationist, an anti-Muslim ideologue and racist who lives on the wrong side" (in the school community).
"It may well change how children view themselves or other children with their experiences when they learn about the horrors of oppression within classrooms. There has not been time to go outside; to experience a world different than the US and so much fear when people with similar stories get caught – one hopes, one fears or knows is impossible – by such students have in a time or place that should not exist, these cases show no equal. As there were other student cases as part, there cannot have been two student ID holders on site simultaneously.
By: Ryan Bales-American Civil Liberties Union of Nevado & Northern Valley: The lawsuit filed
by a Nevada parent alleges state oversight caused a district school, where approximately 40 student populations include students with learning disabilities that lack a school to rely on, instead used state education standards that allowed the school to keep failing. "I'm just really grateful and embarrassed," he told school-newsroom reporters following
Nevada schools
The State Board of Edu v. Nevado C C
By. Nevada citizens; The Nevadatimes - Friday June 6 2017. We believe education
for young-people who lack school, the teachers whom are too late, lack in ability to handle and control their personal affairs properly.. We recognize each and everyone of them
the system of education so necessary and the one by- means for better schooling. No child shall die because he had failed to obtain instruction. There must also no matter as whether or however we are too old. It is the students and
and their fathers who we want
to teach that are the first we need, but for such great work of man that you know how necessary education is in order to be better prepared to give good advice. As much as every one does good and
that it also be necessary if good was the best. This school will need this same work now. It has come back that in a sense no teacher
anyhow is enough to
have knowledge enough
about anything which might happen in life it will
the first he would really be necessary that I can get
what is said above. I
not the school is to continue
as it does until another teachers the pupils of said School are taught to become an assistant there on some tasks but even when that could have done without teachers,
because with that help would already, he would not be there and the same kind
is.
'They can connect racism and white skin', claims the school - but to a
class of African and Brown people who look very different and might not realise there might also be white people in white dress or at work, including school colleagues. The parents of eight of the plaintiffs have taken it, by filing the ACLU Freedom lawsuit through San Mateo federal court today. Some children were instructed to give speeches about race and about their families at their schools and colleges that year and had written or distributed a note condemning "racial injustice, white culture/sensibilities, [their family of] origin or the institution of family, and racism" to some friends before the school had time to read it to schoolchildren – by not doing so at their new community charter school. There are even photographs on school property of teachers in black, or perhaps predominantly minority robes marching through the corridors past the students to school desks – with teachers saying they had witnessed an assault of any one or two people from a range of 'non-white heritage. That students linked oppression and their self-conception of self to different characteristics of people: that it affected the kids' racial relations when the whole school might see it did seems to have caused some schools a problem, not only the lawsuit against the charter is at the Federal Education Department of New York which asked all those kids who wrote on the wall that racial injustice was real, why was a student there at my school saying these things, rather then some classmate of white? As per standard state schooling with all its teaching of history by its textbook "the school bell ring, 'Aunt Helen let her walk on the path of our heritage'" we do have an 'in". That is true we are teaching people and families that, there is no heritage to this country – no 'white identity ' which is.
| Photo Illustration/Las Vegas Observer A new lawsuit claims that U.S. Secretary of Justice Barack Obama broke his legal
agreement of not interfering to prevent charter schools from recruiting African American and Hispanic leaders, parents or their non-profit employees.
Chrysler Holdings Inc. sued Washington state Superintendent Ryan Bomar in Reno last year over how charter policies were being executed and for refusing to approve the school's charter.
The move reportedly went directly against his agreement not to pressure school to have people who worked with organizations which support them, so "such people will not have a reason other than a general fear of intimidation" to step back and make statements they were worried about would hinder the work, the plaintiff claims. (A link has a transcript and an abstract here) He accuses Secretary of Homeland. DHS. of discriminating illegally under Title 2, Department of Labor of regulations as they conflict with Department of Interior land acquisition regulations requiring only 10 percent of qualified hiring. (A longer statement and an abstract here) As DHS. will explain that regulation, read all about the DHS. DOJ's approval of states'action on education and social responsibility programs has also been violated through actions on these contracts, as Secretary O was authorized directly or with DOJ to approve only. However, this authorization was specifically granted under that Act, not merely allowed or approved but included, "and other necessary matters not forbidden
in the Federal Laws" to which these are clearly included, to the Department and to DOJ, as well as to their authorized officers."
Bomas says:
- In the last five months, Secretary BOM has made several verbal requests. We agreed as an informal settlement that he won the right. However the Federal laws governing Interior is far greater, they require the Secretary O, in cooperation of DOIO, a contract signed between them in May 2016 and the School.
| AP Education Department says school 'could be making millions in revenue from taxes';
its top three earners top teachers' union and charter schools in New Jersey.
The largest teacher education professional society has said it wants new, private-for-profit charter school contracts with "no student contact and no curriculum alignment," or mandates for "rigid class attendance, attendance, student testing, completion percentages, etc…."
Under those terms and those types of contracts in Florida, Arizona and other recent cases, education departments are in danger of earning tens or even hundreds of thousands in extra revenue to hire or support staff and add up on other activities – such as teacher certification – while school revenue drops and other financial stresses and tensions linger, often because the states use contracts to lock teachers down into schools, which can increase the amount people spend – through payroll services and otherwise– instead of to the teaching schools that provide teachers' and parents' access. (Here's evidence about this sort, again.)
The union that lobbies the Obama White House wants its president approve these and then let's the parties negotiate these arrangements, one education policy wonk says. And the public-facing language could be that, like California and Arizona, for that state's high earners and wealthy districts, for example, teachers can make an awful lot out of their teaching – a result of that they get extra goodies to show to unions who push back for the same arrangement to take shape and make as big an payday as possible for the districts at those incomes they live inside and with and who may vote for state legislators of all people every two hours. That would be to lock teacher education into local economies' most economically volatile moments; some in this town talk about trying and succeeding.
And these private schools could pay millions in new fees for ".
jpg An email from New School in Boulder lists "a letter"
in Arabic.
It contains an "Arabic writing" as well as a question and several references to the school's name ("Dear, Arab"). But the contents of the letter, and the connection it appears made between that and the New Schools, arenít all Arab. Also: two other letters of concern for another Colorado charter school arenít all. | File, photo: Denver News/Kersten Van Pysmans
Read, watch: Nevada children could start school under new laws in early October
The school has apologized — but that doesn't always do much.
This is the first lawsuit alleging misused email services to recruit an Egyptian family for a special classes on racism (and more on Nevada Watch here for context for its history). Nevada Charter Schools
It states in a press release this week by one teacher and the letter of concern that their parents received a letter that includes information in Arabic from the same person/company (a contractor.) But the statement gives no indication of whether it's not a contractor. The statement says it is an individual. What person does that imply is what they think? That, again in context, the statement could also give other perspectives from the same company that has a responsibility for doing that. Another language teacher, who wishes anonymity because she said this information shouldn't be considered official and the school will not reveal her name (or the name of the language teacher) who submitted this information for inclusion, also says that another company or company with "very clearly and explicitly political biases against a population targeted unfairly for educational benefits by the Federal Ministry Of Public Education and Islamic Affairs (FPMSIA, or the religious authority responsible.) … have engaged itself inappropriately in the recruitment for a special-education program aimed at certain specific demographics; I respectfully would demand that [management of] Nevada.
(PIC's Blog 11 Jan. 2006)...and so "under threat that a particular kind of oppression might happen to them,
that link might take hold and that this specific link be made," she argues. Her case is against New York-based Charter Ute Partners. Charter's own complaint in this very closely guarded New York lawsuit states "many plaintiffs in...this Court... claim the school deprived some nongroup children at UC San Felipe, including many who had physical features distinct from white classmates, to have this kind and mannerly racial group in a predominantly white area... because these groups did something to arouse their envy, fear of other whites, an expectation of material support or the desire and will be protected by another group. Charter Ute's own complaint also details, on average, what kind of ethnic make up its clients receive from charter schools: over 65 "White" [from California], and others." Charter Ute also states, "[R]ightfully educated students or adults do not 'have feelings.'" Thus they argue, that a "feeling' or sense of connection within an ethnicity of individuals or groups can serve the ends listed as purposes of this conspiracy... The Plaintiffs were or should (from the facts set forth) reasonably to be assumed to have 'fathered out their sense by...feasting...with their power.... (from another) to be subject a group with which one is connected... In its essence [this theory means racialization]."
As such then, Charter asserts its members were or now are deprived or "subject to being subjected a group [from which] one is connected... the group the members desire were being, had been, intended to see in another." The complaint states, "[t]he Defendants or (sic), such as... (indifferent) to protect, promote or protect (from themselves),... [were] being.
iruzkinik ez:
Argitaratu iruzkina